Matt prosecutes individual and class action claims on behalf of consumers, policyholders, elders, and others harmed by corporate overreaching.
Get in Touch:
LinkedIn / E-mail
About,
I was working construction in early 2000, when I applied for a home improvement loan and learned someone was using my name and social security number to run up $250,000 in bad checks and fraudulent credit card charges. We filed police reports, filled out forms, and provided all the information the credit bureaus should have needed to clear my name. But Equifax and others blatantly broke the law for years by ignoring my disputes and including the identity thief’s fraudulent debts on my credit report. Banks looked at me like I was going to rob the place and I couldn’t get a loan to finish the home addition our growing family needed. I finally found attorneys Michael and Justin Baxter and Robert Sola to take my case on a contingent fee basis. What luck!!! Five years after that saga began, a jury found that Equifax violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act and, under the Act’s fee-shifting statute, Equifax also had to pay my attorney fees.
I learned that, in order to enforce your rights and protect your family, you either had to be an attorney or be able to afford an attorney. Otherwise, you had to wait until things got so bad that you could hopefully find an attorney to take your case on a contingent fee basis. I became a lawyer to protect my family and stop businesses from cheating or hurting others like they had us.
After seven years doing complex commercial litigation, insurance coverage, and occasional plaintiff’s work at Foster Pepper/Roberts Kaplan LLP and Lane Powell PC, I left in 2016 to found Kirkpatrick Law and fight illegal business conduct full time.
Now I’m a trial lawyer with Oregon Consumer Justice Law, P.C., a mission-driven private law firm formed to enforce Oregon consumers’ rights and support attorneys who share that commitment.
For example,
GM ADMITS IT WRONGFULLY DENIED COUPLE’S WARRANTY CLAIM
Feb. 2023. Roy and Sherri Gosney bought a new Callaway Corvette from Ron Tonkin in 2013. The salespeople assured them that the Callaway supercharger wouldn’t void or negatively affect the GM warranty. When the engine broke down in 2016 due to GM’s catalytic converters, however, GM blamed the supercharger and denied warranty coverage. After fighting their customer for five years, GM finally accepted the truth and confessed judgment for $20,000. In February 2023, a Judge ordered GM to pay the Gosneys’ $113,150.51 in fees and $1,285.67 in costs. She applied a 1.25 fee multiplier because “the essence of the claims in this case involved consumer protection, an area where there is a high need for skilled attorneys for consumers who cannot afford to pay an attorney’s hourly rate” and “to deter Defendant and others similarly situated from objectively unreasonable denials of valid warranty claims in the first instance.”
November 2022. Expert witness in fee hearing where court awarded fees to tenant at attorneys’ full hourly rates and applied 2.0 multiplier to promote access to justice. Multnomah County Circuit Court (MCCC) Case No. 22CV25379.
November 2022. Confidential settlement of medical malpractice claims against Robison Health & Rehabilitation Center. MCCC Case No. 20CV13377.
October 2022. Expert witness in fee hearing where court awarded tenant attorney fees and applied 1.5 multiplier to promote representation of tenants with small-dollar claims. MCCC Case No. 21CV09001.
August 2022. Confidential settlement of wrongful death/medical malpractice claims against Providence and OHSU. MCCC Case No. 19CV52647.
COUPLE FIGHTS THEIR INSURANCE COMPANY FOR COVERAGE
July 2022. Together with Robert Le, I finished a week-long jury trial July 11-15, 2022, against USAA for delay and denial of insurance benefits. John was driving his wife, Jaime, on Highway 82 in northeast Oregon, high above the Minam River. An oncoming car crossed the centerline and smashed into them at high speed. Their car hit the guardrail, rolled several times, and skidded to a stop upside down in the middle of the road. Both were injured but the Jaime suffered significant, long-term back, neck, head, shoulder, arm, leg, waist, and hip injuries and needed surgeries. Years later she still could not do the intense outdoor sports that were central to her health and enjoyment of life. Yet five years later, USAA had made no payment for their underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. The jury returned a $600,000 verdict against USAA, plus attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 19CV16005.
July 2022. Plaintiff’s verdict in two-day jury trial of personal injury claims, defended by Farmers Insurance. Linn County Case No. 21CV12727.
MAN DIES AT OREGON ZOO
WHILE ATTENDING GEORGE CLINTON CONCERT
June 2022. Carl and his friend went to the George Clinton Parliament Funkadelic concert at the Oregon Zoo on a Saturday night in August 2019. There was an intense rainstorm. Carl’s friend went to dance in front of the stage. When Carl did not return to their seats after the concert, his friend got worried. He reported Carl missing to several Zoo security, staff, and volunteers. They did not search for him. On the other side of AfriCafe from the Concert Lawn was a Lease Crutcher Lewis construction site. It was rebuilding the rhinoceros exhibit. Along the north edge of the rhino exhibit was a sheer 9-foot drop-off from the Middle Service Road into the rhino pit. There was no adequate barrier between the Concert Lawn and the rhino pit. They found Mr. Ross’s body two days later in the rhino building. He had six broken ribs, a deep shin laceration, fractured ankle, many cuts and bruises, and one eye swollen shut. The coroner claimed his death was natural and the result of chronic alcohol abuse even though he couldn’t say that Carl would have died that weekend if he hadn’t fallen into the rhino pit. I tried this case with Robert Le, Michael Fuller, and Kelly Jones. After a two-week trial, the jury found Mr. Ross 62.5% at fault and the Oregon Zoo 37.5% at fault for his death. The verdict is currently on appeal. MCCC Case No. 19CV45945. Read more about the case from Koin 6.
May 2022. Oral argument before Oregon Court of Appeals on financial elder abuse claims against Ron Tonkin Chevrolet. Case No. A175691.
MOVING COMPANY HOLDS ELDERLY WOMAN’S BELONGINGS HOSTAGE
March 2022. In March 2019, Dianna needed to move from her studio apartment in Portland to a new place in Salem. She got three bids and went with a $410 bid from All My Sons Moving & Storage. She was on a fixed social security income and told them that was all the money she could pay for the move. She liked the friendly staff and that it said it was a local family-owned business. In fact, All My Sons is a Texas holding-company-owned business, one of dozens of “local” All My Sons across the country. And, All My Sons did not give her ODOT’s Information Bulletin for Moving as Oregon law required, which would have informed Dianna that bids had to be in writing and were not binding. It also would have told her that—if a mover’s bid is off by more than10%—the customer only has to pay an extra 10% on the day of the move in order to get all of their belongings back.
Instead, All My Sons unloaded half of Dianna’s belongings then almost tripled the price (to $1,059) and said it would lock the truck and take the rest of her belongings to storage (including her daily prescription medications) unless she paid the entire amount then and there. It did not tell her that the law said she only had to pay an extra $41 that day to get all her belongings back.
Attorney Chris Mertens and I filed Dianna’s UTPA, conversion, financial elder abuse, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against All My Sons, but they still kept her remaining belongings for almost a year and a half. Later, when we went to inspect the storage facility where they had taken her things, we expected to see a few other people’s things being stored off to one side of All My Sons’ garage. Instead, we saw this:
Hundreds of plywood storage boxes at All My Sons’ Clackamas warehouse. We were eager for trial so we could find out how many of the boxes contained things All My Sons had taken after jacking up other peoples’ prices on moving day. But, three years after the move, All My Sons agreed to pay Dianna $145,787 in damages, costs, and attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 19CV43897.
Jan. 2022. Co-authored Oregon Consumer Justice’s amicus brief in Oregon Supreme Court Case No. S068857.
MAN BREAKS NECK USING WALMART BUBBLE BALL
Dec. 2021. Josh was a volunteer counselor at a church camp for teenagers in northeast Oregon. Josh and one of the campers were using two Bubble Balls purchased at Walmart earlier that day. The box showed two young men wearing the 4-foot-tall balls smashing into each other and called it the “MOST EXTREME CONTACT SPORT EVER!”
When Josh and the camper collided, however, his shoulder harness tore loose and his head slammed forward. He suffered a broken neck, concussion, and other long-term injuries. They Life Flighted him to Portland. Josh alleged that the Bubble Balls were unsafe and that Walmart’s safety program was grossly inadequate. Walmart agreed to a confidential settlement after the court denied its summary judgment motion against Josh’s claim for punitive damages. D. Oregon Case No. 3:19-cv-01115-SB. Read about the case from the Oregonian article here: Oregonian and from the East Oregonian here: Milton-Freewater man sues Walmart for broken spine | Local News | eastoregonian.com.
Sept. 2021. $20,000 money judgment against General Motors plus attorney fees on Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) and Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) claims. MCCC Case No. 19CV22392.
July 2021. $148,707.50 attorney fee award, including 2.0 multiplier, following confidential settlement of MMWA, UTPA, and financial elder abuse claims. MCCC Case No. 19CV25247.
WOMAN FIGHTS HER INSURANCE COMPANY FOR COVERAGE
Jan. 2021. Joanne was a passenger in a vehicle that was hit by another vehicle. She was seriously injured, needing shoulder surgery. Her insurance carrier, Progressive Insurance Company, denied and delayed her claim for years. Four years later, I represented her in a Three Panel Binding Arbitration. The arbitrators awarded $174,986.27 for her injuries plus $82,992.64 for her costs and attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 19CV22019.
April 2020. Confidential settlement of wrongful death claims against drunk driver defended by Pemco. MCCC Case No. 19CV39469.
June 2019. Three-day jury trial of MMWA and UTPA claims. MCCC Case No. 18CV06498.
DISABLED COUPLE CHEATED BY AUTO LENDER
May 2019. Pat and Cheryl responded to a OneMain Financial Services advertisement because they needed a used car loan. OneMain said the car they wanted cost too much and they should look for one under $4,000. They found one and OneMain’s loan representative rushed them through a loan agreement, having them “sign” each page by touching his computer screen and telling them they didn’t need to read it because it would be in the paperwork. Afterwards Pat asked what the interest rate was. The loan rep laughed and said it was 32.55%. They asked for a printed copy but never received one. We filed UTPA and financial elder abuse claims. Fourteen months later, OneMain confessed to a $15,000 judgment and also paid $17,250 in costs and attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 18CV30542.
March 2019. One-week jury trial followed by confidential settlement of MMWA and UTPA claims against Forest River. MCCC Case No. 18CV02571.
ELDERLY COUPLE CHEATED BY SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR
January 2019. Robert and Franciska called sprinkler contractor Al Sievers to perform an annual checkup. Upon arrival, Sievers insisted that they sign an invoice with the work performed and cost left blank. Then he told them their sprinkler controller needed to be replaced and would cost $895. After Robert left, he demanded that Franciska pay $1,655. She asked why the price had nearly doubled. He said $895 was just the cost of the controller and insisted that she pay the full amount. She felt threatened and paid. Two weeks later, they returned from vacation to find the grass in their backyard was brown. We brought MMWA, UTPA, and financial elder abuse claims and learned, among other things, that the controller actually only cost $96. A year and a half later, Sievers agreed to pay the clients $24,000 to settle the case plus $60,000 in costs and attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 17CV50249.
MAN SUFFERING FROM SCHIZOPHRENIA
DIES ASKING FOR HIS BELONGING BACK
October 2018. This case was filed on behalf of a family who lost their son and brother, Jason. Their son had been homeless due to his mental illness even though his family had tried to get him to come back home. On February 20, 2017, he left his belongings on the front porch of a business on SE 82nd Ave in Portland, OR. The business owner found the items and threw them away in his locked dumpster. When Jason came back to the porch his belongings were gone. He went inside the business to ask for his belongings and, according to the business owner, a shouting match ensued. Jason left the business after the owner threatened to call the police. The owner grabbed his gun from a desk drawer and followed Jason outside. He shot Jason even though witnesses said they didn’t see Jason attack or move toward him. The DA did not indict the business owner, but he agreed to pay $400,000 and to apologize to Jason’s family. MCCC Case No. 17CV38414. Read more about the case from The Oregonian. Listen to the family of the deceased and witnesses describe the events and his life: YouTube
COUPLE FIGHTS INSURANCE COMPANY FOR SEWAGE COVERAGE
March 2017. On December 7, 2015, Portland experienced an all-time-record 2.7 inches of rain. The rain supercharged the combined sewage/storm drain system in Kevin and Juliana’s northeast Portland neighborhood. Water backed-up into and flooded their basement. Safeco refused to pay the over $30,000 in needed repairs, saying a policy exclusion applied. We filed suit and reached a confidential settlement after Arbitrator David Landis awarded $31,350.44 in damages and $66,000 in costs and attorney fees. MCCC Case No. 16CV23843.
ELDERLY COUPLE ALLEGEDLY CHEATED BY CAR DEALERSHIP
May 2014. John and Nancy had been looking for a smaller, fuel-efficient car when they saw a used Smart Car they liked. The dealership gave them a CarFax report that said the car had not been in any accidents. We filed MMWA, UTPA, and financial elder abuse claims alleging that, in fact, the car had been in a serious accident with extensive repairs to the steering system and that the dealership knew it because the car had been a dealer loaner. The dealership ultimately agreed to a confidential settlement. MCCC Case No. 140303176.